🌐 Introduction
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 lays down a clear adjudication process under Section 8 to determine whether property is involved in money laundering. The Adjudicating Authority (AA) is entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring fair hearings, deciding on provisional attachments, and ordering confiscation or release of properties. This process strengthens India’s fight against financial crimes while safeguarding the rights of individuals.

1. Initiation of Adjudication
📌 When it starts: Adjudication begins on receipt of:
- Complaint under Section 5(5) (Provisional Attachment)
- Applications under Section 17(4) (Search &
Seizure)
- Applications under Section 18(10) (Personal Search)
📜 Notice to the person:
- A notice of at least 30 days is issued to the person
whose property is attached, seized, or frozen.
- The person must provide:
- Sources of income
- Evidence supporting ownership
- Other relevant details
👥 Joint or Proxy Ownership:
- If property is held on behalf of someone else, notice
is also sent to that person.
- If property is held jointly, all co-owners are
served.
💡 Example:
A flat purchased in the name of Person
A but funded by Person B will require notices to both parties.

2. Consideration and Hearing
The AA considers:
- 📄 Reply to the notice
- 🗣️ Oral or written arguments of the aggrieved person and the Director/authorised officer
- 📂 Supporting evidence and documents
- 👩⚖️ Opportunity for others:
- If another person claims the property, they must be
heard to prove it is not involved in laundering.
💡 Example: If a bank account is attached, the
account holder can present proof that the funds are legitimate.

3. Findings of the Adjudicating
Authority
🔒If the AA determines that property is involved in
money laundering:
- Attachment or seizure continues during investigation
(up to 365 days) or until the proceedings are completed in India or
abroad.
- After confirmation by a Special Court, the attachment
becomes final.
⏳Exclusion:
- Any period during which the investigation is stayed
by a court is not counted in the 365-day limit.
💡Example:
If a luxury car is provisionally
attached, the AA may confirm the attachment for investigation and pending trial
in a Special Court.

4. Possession after Confirmation
Once the AA confirms the attachment, the Director or
authorised officer must:
- 🏠Take possession of the property
- 🏦If taking physical possession is impractical (e.g.,
frozen accounts), the confiscation order has the same effect
💡Example:
A frozen bank account cannot be
physically possessed, but the person cannot access the funds until adjudication
is complete.

5. Role of the Special Court
⚖️If money laundering is proven:
- Property used in the offence is confiscated to the
Central Government.
✔️If no money laundering:
- Property is released to rightful owner.
🛑 Incomplete or interrupted trial:
- If the accused dies, becomes a proclaimed offender,
or trial cannot conclude, the Special Court may issue appropriate orders
on confiscation or release based on available evidence.
🤝Restoration to legitimate claimants:
- If someone suffered loss in good faith due to the
laundering offence, the court may restore property or part of it.
- Claimants must show they:
- Acted in good faith
- Took all reasonable precautions
- Are not involved in money laundering
💡Example:
If property is confiscated, but a
family member who was unaware of its criminal origin suffered a loss, the court
can restore it to them.

6. Vesting of Property in Central
Government
🏛️ Once confiscated : All rights and title of the property
vest absolutely in the Central Government, free from encumbrances.
🚫Exceptions:
- If any encumbrance or lease-hold interest was created
to defeat the Act, it can be declared void.
- Persons remain liable for damages for any prior
encumbrances.
💡Example:
A flat mortgaged to a bank but later
confiscated will vest in the government, and any fraudulent lease created to
defeat the Act is void.
Summary – Flow of Adjudicating Process
Step
|
Authority
|
Action
|
Outcome
|
Example
|
1
|
AA
|
Issue
30-day notice
|
Person
submits income/source proof
|
Flat
purchased from unknown funds
|
2
|
AA
|
Hear reply, Director/Officer, and
other claimants
|
Review evidence
|
Bank account attachment hearing
|
3
|
AA
|
Confirm
attachment
|
Property
frozen/retained
|
Luxury
car held during trial
|
4
|
Director
|
Take possession or enforce
confiscation
|
Restricted access
|
Frozen account remains inaccessible
|
5
|
Special
Court
|
Trial
conclusion
|
Confiscation
or release
|
Court
orders release if property legitimate
|
6
|
Special Court
|
Restoration to claimant if
applicable
|
Partial or full return
|
Family member gets property back
|
7
|
Central
Govt
|
Vesting
of property
|
Ownership
fully transfers
|
Confiscated
flat vests in government
|

Key Takeaways
- Adjudicating Authority is the first step in verifying
the legality of attached, seized, or frozen property.
- Natural justice is followed: notice, reply, hearing,
and evidence review.
- Special Court finalizes confiscation or release after
trial.
- Central Government ultimately holds confiscated
property, ensuring illegal proceeds cannot be used further.
🏁 Conclusion
Section 8 of the PMLA, 2002 ensures a transparent and balanced adjudication process. From provisional attachment to final confiscation or release, it empowers authorities while safeguarding legitimate rights. By vesting confiscated property in the Central Government and providing opportunities for fair hearing, the law strikes a balance between combating financial crimes and protecting lawful ownership.